Case Studies

GT Innovation

With our data-driven strategies, GT consistently delivers winning results, transforming insights into successful election outcomes.
The Trump Comeback: Targeting, Turnout & Persuasion
Grassroots Targeting helped form the new electorate in 2024 by having a pulse on voter opinion, ideology and drivers. President Trump’s historic win was fueled by data-driven strategies.
View Case Study
Targeting Delivers Historic Trump Victories
Donald J. Trump for President 2024 successfully targeted women aged 18-44 in the “Blue Wall” states of Michigan, Pennsylvania & Wisconsin who were not committed to voting for a candidate and thought Kamala Harris would better represent them on abortion, but preferred President Trump’s position when informed.
View Case Study
PA VBM Effort Contributes to Republican Sweep
In 2024, Republicans started with an enormous historical disadvantage with pre-election day voting.Grassroots Targeting developed a targeted “prospect” list with the messages that would persuade our voters to vote by mail. The modeled targets produced over 52K new Republican early votes and added 240K new Republicans to the permanent VBM list.
View Case Study
Build a Better NV Field Program – 2022
The Nevada field program empowered independents to elect Governor Lombardo, the first candidate in over 40 years to unseat a NV Governor incumbent. The field program led 775,199 door-to-door communications; low-propensity Republicans voted at a 122% advantage over the Democrats and the true middle (No Political Party) turned out at 72%.
View Case Study
Ron Johnson Reigns in Badger State Battleground
In the beginning 2022, we worked with the Ron Johnson campaign on their mini campaigns. The purpose was to push as many voters as possible from the persuasion universes to the Johnson/GOTV universes. We built dozens of universes that were message specific for mail, digital, P2P texting, door to door to maximize these mini campaigns. They were able to move 44% of the persuasion universes to the GOTV universes by August.
View Case Study
Oil and Natural Gas – Colorado Fracking Proposition – Vote No
Colorado ballot initiative Proposition 112 would have effectively killed the oil and natural gas industry in the state. GT conducted a modeling project with the objective of finding the persuadable voters. The initial ballot was pro Prop 112: 51% support/ 37% oppose (-14). GT’s audiences targeted persuadable/ soft support voters who were pro-fracking. This resulted in a winning campaign with the failure of Proposition 112: 55.12% ‘no’ to 44.88% ‘yes’ (+10).
View Case Study
North Dakota Ballot Measure 4 – Vote No – “Keep It Local”
Ballot Measure 4 sought to effectively eliminate property taxes for the state; leaving a $3.15B deficit – majorly increasing taxes elsewhere. GT conducted a modeling project and found the messages that moved voters towards opposing Ballot Measure 4. The voters’ most persuadable message moved them an average of +18% towards opposing Ballot Measure 4. The KIL Coalition used these messages to target voters – resulting in a 26.92% win - 63.46% oppose to 36.54% support.
Case Study Coming Soon